As I wrote about earlier my local school district Anoka-Hennepin (AH) is pushing hard to pass a new levy. While no one is doubting (least of all me) that AH will experience real cuts if the levys all fail, What I do question is how the money is spent and if it is right to force everyone to pay exorbitant prices (over $9,000 per student) for a mediocre education - if not actually Dumbing Us Down
Over at Truth V. The Machine (TvM) in Education Funding and My Levy several key points are mentioned:
...where does the money go? When you buy a box of “education”, what are you buying?
Looking at the same document, for 05-06, the district spent 48.5% on Instruction-Salaries. Add in benefits and “All Other”, (not sure what that is), that number goes to 68.3%.
Add in Instructional and Pupil Support Services, that number goes to 76.9%.
Add in School Level Administration, that number goes to 81.5%.
In other words, let’s be clear. When we go to “support the children”, or “invest in property values”, or buy a box of “education,” we’re talking primarily about increasing teacher salaries and benefits
TvM was able to dig up some interesting facts regarding teacher salaries over the past several years:
The Minnesota School Board Association website does have teacher salary averages for the districts. You can find that here. Here’s a summary of the data there for District 11.
School Year BAMIN BAMAX ST MAMIN MAMAX ST AVG TP% 1999-2000 $28,854 $44,223 12 $32,036 $51,457 12 $3,001 5.31% 2000-2001 $30,702 $45,992 11 $34,129 $53,515 11 $3,380 5.68% 2001-2002 $31,316 $46,912 11 $34,812 $54,585 11 $2,603 4.22% 2002-2003 $32,000 $47,875 11 $35,600 $56,225 11 $3,648 5.68% 2003-2004 $32,480 $49,300 12 $36,045 $58,800 12 $3,683 5.60% 2004-2005 $33,942 $49,400 11 $37,744 $58,800 11 $3,071 4.42% 2005-2006 $34,621 $50,759 11 $38,499 $60,711 11 $3,804 5.46% 2006-2007 $35,962 $51,774 10 $40,705 $61,925 10 $3,182 4.33%
I believe (but am not sure) that TP is for total package. But, you can see increases every year. Some of those increases came in years when the state was running a deficit. (From 02 to 05, the basic revenue amount stayed put at $4,601.)
That's some decent salary increases., not a dry year in the bunch. This is again the problem with public education. It does not have to be bothered by market forces, you want 5% salary increases every-single-year, well if you have enough lobbying power, you got it! However, this year the State backed off and, while AH is not actually getting less money from the State, it is getting a smaller increase than it has in the past. It looks to me like this levy simply ensures automatic yearly salary increases
Here is what I propose: Give all children the choice to pick the school they want, then give them the money to go do it. I mean any school, public, private, homeschool. Why are we forced by our tax dollars to pay huge amounts of money for a poor education? Let the money follow the student and you will find an amazing revival in education in the this country. Until that time we will continue to pay more and more for a worse and worse education. If we have freedom of choice for school, there would no longer be a need to be worried about the Teacher's Union. If they can help provide a good education then the students will come, if not they will find the solution that works for them. But, again don't expect the Teacher's Unions pushing anything that would help the children, remember they are The Teachers Union, not the Children's Union, even though they love to hide behind the backs of our children.
Vote No on the levy until we have freedom of choice for our schools.















